PowerConf C200 vs Kiyo Pro Comparison

Compare PowerConf C200 vs Kiyo Pro side by side: specs, ratings, pros and cons, and which one fits your room best.

On this page

At a Glance

The Anker PowerConf C200 is a compact budget 2K webcam aimed at home offices and everyday calls. It records 2560 × 1440 at 30 fps on a 5 MP sensor, with autofocus, a selectable 95° / 78° / 65° field of view, dual stereo mics, and a built-in privacy cover switch.

View on Anker (opens in a new tab)

Best For: Budget buyers
Res.: 2K (2560 x 1440)
View: 95°
Autofocus: Yes (15 cm to 3 m)
Low Light: —
Mics: Dual stereo with AGC and noise cancellation
Shutter: Yes (built-in camera cover switch)
Connect: USB-C

Kiyo Pro

The Razer Kiyo Pro is a 1080p webcam with a Sony STARVIS IMX327 sensor and an adaptive light sensor. It records 1080p at up to 60 fps, with HDR at 30 fps.

View on Razer (opens in a new tab)

Best For: Dim rooms
Res.: 1080p at 60 fps
View: 103°
Autofocus: Yes
Low Light: Yes (adaptive light sensor, Sony STARVIS sensor)
Mics: Stereo omni-directional
Shutter: —
Connect: USB 3.0 (USB-C port on camera)

Review Scores Compared

Expert Score

PowerConf C2008.1/10
Kiyo Pro8.1/10

Image Quality

PowerConf C2008.7/10 Leads
Kiyo Pro8.0/10

Low-Light Performance

PowerConf C2007.0/10
Kiyo Pro8.3/10 Leads

Field of View & Framing

PowerConf C2008.3/10
Kiyo Pro8.9/10 Leads

Microphone

PowerConf C2007.0/10
Kiyo Pro7.0/10

Build & Privacy

PowerConf C2008.3/10 Leads
Kiyo Pro7.5/10

Connection & Software

PowerConf C2009.0/10
Kiyo Pro9.0/10

Why PowerConf C200 Beats Kiyo Pro (and Vice Versa)

Why PowerConf C200 beats Kiyo Pro

Better build & privacy: 8.3 vs 7.5 out of 10
Better image quality: 8.7 vs 8.0 out of 10
Max Resolution: 2K (2560 x 1440) vs 1080p at 60 fps
Megapixels: 5 MP vs 2.1 MP

Why Kiyo Pro beats PowerConf C200

Better low-light performance: 8.3 vs 7.0 out of 10
Better field of view & framing: 8.9 vs 8.3 out of 10
Max Frame Rate: 60 fps vs 30 fps
Sensor: Sony STARVIS IMX327 vs 1/2.7" CMOS
Field of View: 103° vs 95°

Review-score leads of 0.5+ points out of 10 first, then specs where only one comes out ahead.

Full Specifications

Show only differences

General

	PowerConf C200	Kiyo Pro
Best For	Budget buyers	Dim rooms

Image

	PowerConf C200	Kiyo Pro
Max Resolution	2K (2560 x 1440) Better	1080p at 60 fps
Max Frame Rate	30 fps	60 fps Better
Sensor	1/2.7" CMOS	Sony STARVIS IMX327 Better
Megapixels	5 MP Better	2.1 MP
Field of View	95°	103° Better
Autofocus	Yes (15 cm to 3 m)	Yes
HDR	—	Yes (at 30 fps)
Light Correction	—	Yes (adaptive light sensor, Sony STARVIS sensor)
Aperture	—	f/2.0
Video Format	MJPEG / YUV	H.264

Audio

	PowerConf C200	Kiyo Pro
Microphones	Dual stereo with AGC and noise cancellation	Stereo omni-directional
Mic Range	3 m	—
Noise Reduction	Yes	—

Design & Privacy

	PowerConf C200	Kiyo Pro
Privacy Shutter	Yes (built-in camera cover switch)	—
Mounting	Adjustable clip/stand	Detachable L-shaped stand
Tripod Thread	1/4 in thread	1/4 in thread
Weight	—	196.3 g

Connectivity

	PowerConf C200	Kiyo Pro
Connection	USB-C	USB 3.0 (USB-C port on camera)
Cable Length	—	1.5 m
Software	AnkerWork	Razer Synapse
Operating Systems	Windows 7+, macOS 10.11+	—

Identifiers

	PowerConf C200	Kiyo Pro
Model Number	A3369	RZ19-0364

Takeaways

It's a tie on our rating (4/5) between PowerConf C200 and Kiyo Pro, so choose on the rows that matter most to you.
Choose PowerConf C200 for budget buyers.
Choose Kiyo Pro for dim rooms.

Pros and Cons

PowerConf C200

PROS

2K at 30 fps
Autofocus, 95/78/65° view
Stereo mics with noise cancellation
Built-in cover switch

CONS

No HDR listed
Small 1/2.7-inch sensor