Facecam MK.2 vs PanaCast 20 Comparison
Compare Facecam MK.2 vs PanaCast 20 side by side: specs, ratings, pros and cons, and which one fits your room best.
On this page
At a Glance
Facecam MK.2
The Elgato Facecam MK.2 is a 1080p webcam built for streaming and recording. It has a Sony STARVIS 1/2.5-inch sensor, the Elgato Prime Lens (f/2.4, fixed focus) and an 84° field of view.
- Best For
- Streamers
- Res.
- 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0)
- View
- 84°
- Autofocus
- No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm)
- Mics
- —
- Connect
- USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed)
PanaCast 20
The Jabra PanaCast 20 is a personal 4K webcam with a 13 MP sensor and a wide 117° diagonal field of view. It has Intelligent Zoom, Vivid HDR and picture-in-picture.
- Best For
- Corporate IT
- Res.
- 4K
- View
- 117°
- Autofocus
- —
- Mics
- 3 MEMS
- Connect
- USB-C (USB 3.0/2.0)
Review Scores Compared
Expert Score
Image Quality
Low-Light Performance
Field of View & Framing
Microphone
Build & Privacy
Connection & Software
Why Facecam MK.2 Beats PanaCast 20 (and Vice Versa)
Why Facecam MK.2 beats PanaCast 20
- Better low-light performance: 9.0 vs 7.5 out of 10
- Max Frame Rate: 60 (1080p), 120 (720p) vs 30 fps
- Sensor: Sony STARVIS 1/2.5" CMOS vs 1/3.2"
- Weight: 90 g vs 136 g
Why PanaCast 20 beats Facecam MK.2
- Better image quality: 10.0 vs 6.3 out of 10
- Better field of view & framing: 9.8 vs 7.0 out of 10
- Max Resolution: 4K vs 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0)
- Field of View: 117° vs 84°
Review-score leads of 0.5+ points out of 10 first, then specs where only one comes out ahead.
Full Specifications
General
| Facecam MK.2 | PanaCast 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Streamers | Corporate IT |
Image
| Facecam MK.2 | PanaCast 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0) | 4K Better |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 (1080p), 120 (720p) Better | 30 fps |
| Sensor | Sony STARVIS 1/2.5" CMOS Better | 1/3.2" |
| Megapixels | — | 13 MP |
| Field of View | 84° | 117° Better |
| Autofocus | No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm) | — |
| HDR | — | Yes (Vivid HDR) |
| Digital Zoom | — | 3 (lossless at 720p) |
| AI Framing | — | Intelligent Zoom, picture-in-picture |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.25 |
Audio
| Facecam MK.2 | PanaCast 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Microphones | — | 3 MEMS |
Design & Privacy
| Facecam MK.2 | PanaCast 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tripod Thread | 1/4 in thread | — |
| Weight | 90 g Better | 136 g |
| Dimensions | 84 x 38 x 61 mm | 44 x 25 x 80 mm |
Connectivity
| Facecam MK.2 | PanaCast 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed) | USB-C (USB 3.0/2.0) |
| Cable Length | — | 1.5 m |
| Software | — | Jabra Direct, Jabra Xpress |
| Operating Systems | Windows 10 (64-bit)+, macOS 12+ | Windows 8.1/10/11, macOS 10.15+ |
| Certifications | — | Microsoft Teams, Zoom |
| UVC | UVC 1.5 | — |
In the Box
| Facecam MK.2 | PanaCast 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| In the Box | — | PanaCast 20, carry case, 1.5 m USB-C to USB-A cable |
| Warranty | — | 2 years |
Takeaways
- It's a tie on our rating (4/5) between Facecam MK.2 and PanaCast 20, so choose on the rows that matter most to you.
- Choose Facecam MK.2 for streamers.
- Choose PanaCast 20 for corporate IT.
Pros and Cons
Facecam MK.2
PROS
- Uncompressed 1080p60 over USB 3.0
- Sony STARVIS sensor
- 720p120 for smooth motion
- Light at 90 g
CONS
- Fixed focus (30-120 cm)
- No built-in mic listed
PanaCast 20
PROS
- 4K30 with Vivid HDR
- Widest view here: 117°
- Teams and Zoom certified
- Intelligent Zoom and picture-in-picture
CONS
- Autofocus not listed
- Small 1/3.2-inch sensor
Similar Comparisons
Facecam MK.2 vs PowerConf C200
Facecam MK.2 vs Link 2
Facecam MK.2 vs Brio 500
PanaCast 20 vs PowerConf C200
PanaCast 20 vs Link 2
PanaCast 20 vs Brio 500
Quick Verdict
- Facecam MK.2 7.7Leads in Low-Light Performance
- PanaCast 20 8.5Best overallLeads in Image Quality, Field of View & Framing


