Facecam MK.2 vs Kiyo Pro Comparison
Compare Facecam MK.2 vs Kiyo Pro side by side: specs, ratings, pros and cons, and which one fits your room best.
On this page
At a Glance
Facecam MK.2
The Elgato Facecam MK.2 is a 1080p webcam built for streaming and recording. It has a Sony STARVIS 1/2.5-inch sensor, the Elgato Prime Lens (f/2.4, fixed focus) and an 84° field of view.
- Best For
- Streamers
- Res.
- 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0)
- View
- 84°
- Autofocus
- No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm)
- Low Light
- —
- Mics
- —
- Connect
- USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed)
Kiyo Pro
The Razer Kiyo Pro is a 1080p webcam with a Sony STARVIS IMX327 sensor and an adaptive light sensor. It records 1080p at up to 60 fps, with HDR at 30 fps.
- Best For
- Dim rooms
- Res.
- 1080p at 60 fps
- View
- 103°
- Autofocus
- Yes
- Low Light
- Yes (adaptive light sensor, Sony STARVIS sensor)
- Mics
- Stereo omni-directional
- Connect
- USB 3.0 (USB-C port on camera)
Review Scores Compared
Expert Score
Image Quality
Low-Light Performance
Field of View & Framing
Microphone
Build & Privacy
Connection & Software
Why Facecam MK.2 Beats Kiyo Pro (and Vice Versa)
Why Facecam MK.2 beats Kiyo Pro
- Better low-light performance: 9.0 vs 8.3 out of 10
- Better build & privacy: 8.0 vs 7.5 out of 10
- Weight: 90 g vs 196.3 g
Why Kiyo Pro beats Facecam MK.2
- Better field of view & framing: 8.9 vs 7.0 out of 10
- Better image quality: 8.0 vs 6.3 out of 10
- Field of View: 103° vs 84°
- Autofocus: Yes vs No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm)
Review-score leads of 0.5+ points out of 10 first, then specs where only one comes out ahead.
Full Specifications
General
| Facecam MK.2 | Kiyo Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Streamers | Dim rooms |
Image
| Facecam MK.2 | Kiyo Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0) | 1080p at 60 fps |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 (1080p), 120 (720p) | 60 fps |
| Sensor | Sony STARVIS 1/2.5" CMOS | Sony STARVIS IMX327 |
| Megapixels | — | 2.1 MP |
| Field of View | 84° | 103° Better |
| Autofocus | No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm) | Yes Better |
| HDR | — | Yes (at 30 fps) |
| Light Correction | — | Yes (adaptive light sensor, Sony STARVIS sensor) |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Video Format | — | H.264 |
Audio
| Facecam MK.2 | Kiyo Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Microphones | — | Stereo omni-directional |
Design & Privacy
| Facecam MK.2 | Kiyo Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Mounting | — | Detachable L-shaped stand |
| Tripod Thread | 1/4 in thread | 1/4 in thread |
| Weight | 90 g Better | 196.3 g |
| Dimensions | 84 x 38 x 61 mm | — |
Connectivity
| Facecam MK.2 | Kiyo Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed) | USB 3.0 (USB-C port on camera) |
| Cable Length | — | 1.5 m |
| Software | — | Razer Synapse |
| Operating Systems | Windows 10 (64-bit)+, macOS 12+ | — |
| UVC | UVC 1.5 | — |
Identifiers
| Facecam MK.2 | Kiyo Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Model Number | — | RZ19-0364 |
Takeaways
- It's a tie on our rating (4/5) between Facecam MK.2 and Kiyo Pro, so choose on the rows that matter most to you.
- Choose Facecam MK.2 for streamers.
- Choose Kiyo Pro for dim rooms.
Pros and Cons
Facecam MK.2
PROS
- Uncompressed 1080p60 over USB 3.0
- Sony STARVIS sensor
- 720p120 for smooth motion
- Light at 90 g
CONS
- Fixed focus (30-120 cm)
- No built-in mic listed
Kiyo Pro
PROS
- Sony STARVIS sensor with adaptive light sensor
- 1080p at 60 fps, HDR at 30 fps
- Wide 103/90/80° view
- Gorilla Glass 3 lens
CONS
- No privacy shutter listed
- Heavier at 196.3 g
Similar Comparisons
Facecam MK.2 vs PowerConf C200
Facecam MK.2 vs Link 2
Facecam MK.2 vs PanaCast 20
Facecam MK.2 vs Brio 500
Kiyo Pro vs PowerConf C200
Kiyo Pro vs Link 2
Quick Verdict
- Facecam MK.2 7.7Leads in Low-Light Performance, Build & Privacy
- Kiyo Pro 8.1Best overallLeads in Image Quality, Field of View & Framing


