Facecam MK.2 vs Brio 300 Comparison
Compare Facecam MK.2 vs Brio 300 side by side: specs, ratings, pros and cons, and which one fits your room best.
On this page
At a Glance
Facecam MK.2
The Elgato Facecam MK.2 is a 1080p webcam built for streaming and recording. It has a Sony STARVIS 1/2.5-inch sensor, the Elgato Prime Lens (f/2.4, fixed focus) and an 84° field of view.
- Best For
- Streamers
- Res.
- 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0)
- View
- 84°
- Autofocus
- No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm)
- Low Light
- —
- Mics
- —
- Shutter
- —
- Connect
- USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed)
Brio 300
The Logitech Brio 300 is an entry-level 1080p webcam. It has a 2 MP sensor, fixed focus, a 70° field of view and RightLight 2 auto light correction.
- Best For
- Students
- Res.
- 1080p
- View
- 70°
- Autofocus
- No (fixed focus)
- Low Light
- Yes (RightLight 2)
- Mics
- Mono
- Shutter
- Yes (integrated privacy shutter)
- Connect
- USB-C (attached cable)
Review Scores Compared
Expert Score
Image Quality
Low-Light Performance
Field of View & Framing
Microphone
Build & Privacy
Connection & Software
Why Facecam MK.2 Beats Brio 300 (and Vice Versa)
Why Facecam MK.2 beats Brio 300
- Better field of view & framing: 7.0 vs 5.1 out of 10
- Better low-light performance: 9.0 vs 8.0 out of 10
- Better image quality: 6.3 vs 5.7 out of 10
- Max Resolution: 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0) vs 1080p
- Max Frame Rate: 60 (1080p), 120 (720p) vs 30 fps
- Field of View: 84° vs 70°
Why Brio 300 beats Facecam MK.2
- Better build & privacy: 9.0 vs 8.0 out of 10
- Weight: 74.6 g vs 90 g
Review-score leads of 0.5+ points out of 10 first, then specs where only one comes out ahead.
Full Specifications
General
| Facecam MK.2 | Brio 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Streamers | Students |
Image
| Facecam MK.2 | Brio 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0) Better | 1080p |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 (1080p), 120 (720p) Better | 30 fps |
| Sensor | Sony STARVIS 1/2.5" CMOS | — |
| Megapixels | — | 2 MP |
| Field of View | 84° Better | 70° |
| Autofocus | No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm) | No (fixed focus) |
| Light Correction | — | Yes (RightLight 2) |
| Digital Zoom | — | 1 x |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | — |
Audio
| Facecam MK.2 | Brio 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Microphones | — | Mono |
| Mic Range | — | 1.22 m |
Design & Privacy
| Facecam MK.2 | Brio 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Privacy Shutter | — | Yes (integrated privacy shutter) |
| Tripod Thread | 1/4 in thread | — |
| Weight | 90 g | 74.6 g Better |
| Dimensions | 84 x 38 x 61 mm | — |
Connectivity
| Facecam MK.2 | Brio 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed) | USB-C (attached cable) |
| Cable Length | — | 1.5 m |
| Software | — | Logi Tune |
| Operating Systems | Windows 10 (64-bit)+, macOS 12+ | — |
| UVC | UVC 1.5 | — |
In the Box
| Facecam MK.2 | Brio 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Warranty | — | 1-year limited hardware |
Takeaways
- Our pick: Facecam MK.2, with the highest spec-based rating (4/5).
- Choose Facecam MK.2 for streamers.
- Choose Brio 300 for students.
Pros and Cons
Facecam MK.2
PROS
- Uncompressed 1080p60 over USB 3.0
- Sony STARVIS sensor
- 720p120 for smooth motion
- Light at 90 g
CONS
- Fixed focus (30-120 cm)
- No built-in mic listed
Brio 300
PROS
- Integrated privacy shutter
- RightLight 2 light correction
- USB-C plug and play
- Very light at 74.6 g
CONS
- Fixed focus
- Mono mic, 70° view
Similar Comparisons
Facecam MK.2 vs PowerConf C200
Facecam MK.2 vs Link 2
Facecam MK.2 vs PanaCast 20
Facecam MK.2 vs Brio 500
Brio 300 vs C920e
Brio 300 vs PowerConf C200
Quick Verdict
- Facecam MK.2 7.7Best overallLeads in Image Quality, Low-Light Performance, Field of View & Framing
- Brio 300 6.8Leads in Build & Privacy


