Facecam MK.2 vs Tiny 2 Comparison
Compare Facecam MK.2 vs Tiny 2 side by side: specs, ratings, pros and cons, and which one fits your room best.
On this page
At a Glance
Facecam MK.2
The Elgato Facecam MK.2 is a 1080p webcam built for streaming and recording. It has a Sony STARVIS 1/2.5-inch sensor, the Elgato Prime Lens (f/2.4, fixed focus) and an 84° field of view.
- Best For
- Streamers
- Res.
- 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0)
- View
- 84°
- Autofocus
- No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm)
- Mics
- —
- Connect
- USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed)
Tiny 2
The OBSBOT Tiny 2 is a 4K webcam on a 2-axis gimbal. It has a large 1/1.5-inch 50 MP sensor, f/1.9 aperture, all-pixel PDAF autofocus and HDR.
- Best For
- Teachers and trainers
- Res.
- 4K
- View
- 85.5°
- Autofocus
- Yes (all-pixel PDAF, plus manual)
- Mics
- Dual omni-directional with noise reduction
- Connect
- USB 3.0
Review Scores Compared
Expert Score
Image Quality
Low-Light Performance
Field of View & Framing
Microphone
Build & Privacy
Connection & Software
Why Facecam MK.2 Beats Tiny 2 (and Vice Versa)
Why Facecam MK.2 beats Tiny 2
- Better connection & software: 9.0 vs 8.0 out of 10
- Better low-light performance: 9.0 vs 8.5 out of 10
- Max Frame Rate: 60 (1080p), 120 (720p) vs 30 (4K), 60 (1080p)
- Weight: 90 g vs 95.6 g
- Connection: USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed) vs USB 3.0
Why Tiny 2 beats Facecam MK.2
- Better image quality: 10.0 vs 6.3 out of 10
- Max Resolution: 4K vs 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0)
- Field of View: 85.5° vs 84°
- Autofocus: Yes (all-pixel PDAF, plus manual) vs No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm)
Review-score leads of 0.5+ points out of 10 first, then specs where only one comes out ahead.
Full Specifications
General
| Facecam MK.2 | Tiny 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Streamers | Teachers and trainers |
Image
| Facecam MK.2 | Tiny 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1080p at 60 fps (uncompressed over USB 3.0) | 4K Better |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 (1080p), 120 (720p) Better | 30 (4K), 60 (1080p) |
| Sensor | Sony STARVIS 1/2.5" CMOS | 1/1.5" CMOS |
| Megapixels | — | 50 MP |
| Field of View | 84° | 85.5° Better |
| Autofocus | No (fixed focus, 30-120 cm) | Yes (all-pixel PDAF, plus manual) Better |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Digital Zoom | — | 4 x |
| AI Framing | — | AI tracking with auto zoom on 2-axis gimbal; gesture and voice control |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/1.9 |
Audio
| Facecam MK.2 | Tiny 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Microphones | — | Dual omni-directional with noise reduction |
| Noise Reduction | — | Yes |
Design & Privacy
| Facecam MK.2 | Tiny 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tripod Thread | 1/4 in thread | — |
| Weight | 90 g Better | 95.6 g |
| Dimensions | 84 x 38 x 61 mm | — |
| Pan / Tilt | — | Pan ±140°, tilt −30° to +70° |
Connectivity
| Facecam MK.2 | Tiny 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | USB-C (USB 3.0 for uncompressed) Better | USB 3.0 |
| Software | — | OBSBOT Center |
| Operating Systems | Windows 10 (64-bit)+, macOS 12+ | Windows 10+, macOS 11+ |
| UVC | UVC 1.5 | — |
Takeaways
- It's a tie on our rating (4/5) between Facecam MK.2 and Tiny 2, so choose on the rows that matter most to you.
- Choose Facecam MK.2 for streamers.
- Choose Tiny 2 for teachers and trainers.
Pros and Cons
Facecam MK.2
PROS
- Uncompressed 1080p60 over USB 3.0
- Sony STARVIS sensor
- 720p120 for smooth motion
- Light at 90 g
CONS
- Fixed focus (30-120 cm)
- No built-in mic listed
Tiny 2
PROS
- Largest listed sensor here (1/1.5-inch, 50 MP)
- 2-axis gimbal with AI tracking
- Gesture and voice control
- 4K30 and 1080p60
CONS
- No privacy shutter listed
- Some effects need a strong GPU
Similar Comparisons
Facecam MK.2 vs PowerConf C200
Facecam MK.2 vs Link 2
Facecam MK.2 vs PanaCast 20
Facecam MK.2 vs Brio 500
- Tiny 2 vs PowerConf C200

- Tiny 2 vs Link 2
Quick Verdict
- Facecam MK.2 7.7Leads in Low-Light Performance, Connection & Software
- Tiny 2 8.4Best overallLeads in Image Quality, Field of View & Framing

